Does Identity of the Creator Affect How We See Art?

When looking at art we are either moved emotionally or not. When we ask questions or begin conversation about a work after viewing it, then the artist has caused a reaction. Sometimes the reaction is one of excitement, anger or disappointment or unbelief, yet there is a reaction. This is the goal of every artist. The question is then asked, does knowing the identity of the artist affect how the art is perceived? For myself, my answer is no or at least not always. When observing a work of art in galleries or museums, I wait until after observing the work to read who the artist is. The work is allowed to stand on it's own. The visual elements such as texture, space, line, form and color arrangement affect how the work is perceived. Sometimes it is the subject itself or the materials used that have the most affect. A figure drawn in conte crayon or graphite might not elicit much of a reaction but the placement of the figure or combination of figures could elicit a response. Sometimes it's the message the work communicates that causes a response. Is a painting by Picasso considered amazing because it is a painting by Picasso or because it is an amazing work of art? If Leonardo da Vinci's architectural drawings were actually done by a student would they still be considered ahead of their time?

Work that questions spiritual, emotional, political, educational beliefs is work I'd spend more time examining. Sometimes the identity of the creator is ignored. If the work causes a reaction, then it will undoubtedly generate a following. The perspective with which later work is seen will be affected by the creator's identity. I prefer to examine a work without knowing who the artist is initially. If I am amazed or inspired by the work, then I'll look to know who the artist is.